James

May 292011
 

Where the more fortunately educated read to be surprised, the middle class reads to have its notions confirmed, and deviations from customary verbal formulas disconcert and annoy it.

–Paul Fussell, Class (1983)

Someone named “Jonathon Howard,” writing in something called the Savramento Book Review, must be a profoundly middle-class sort of fellow, given how disconcerted and annoyed he was at Thomas Ligotti’s The Conspiracy against the Human Race.  His 225-word micro-screed against Conspiracy turned up on one of my Google searches for reviews of that magnificent work of pessimism.  I shan’t bother with the substance of the review — I can’t bother with what isn’t there — but I do want to pull out one sentence thereof as a specimen of a larger sentiment.

Mostly it’s the ravings of an impotent teenager who is so upset that existence doesn’t conform itself to expectations that nonexistence, for all, would be better.

That’s a sentiment anyone who has the temerity to be seriously unhappy with the world will hear a lot.  “You’re so adolescent.”  “Your whining is so immature.”  “Grow up!”

Why is it that act-your-age injunctions are so often directed against the unhappy and pessimistic?  The folks who hurl these injunctions would have us believe that “adults” have a superior sort of virtue that adolescents generally don’t, the virtue of bearing suffering.  But I have a rather different explanation.

Let us begin with the observation that complainers are unloved.  It’s not much fun to be around unhappy people, and this antipathetic emotional reaction is easy to understand.

(1) Complaining is a warning that someone might be an unreliable partner.  Complaints signal frustration and thwarted desire, and people might be afraid to trust those who are full of unfulfilled desire.  A spouse with unfulfilled desires might be more likely to have affairs.  The discontented worker may will sit in his cubicle looking for Internet porn rather than industriously laboring over spreadsheets.  So complaining people are likely to be avoided in productive relationships.

(2) Complainers have lower status.  Status-seeking is one of the most fundamental drives people have.  The higher their status, the more content.  So signals of discontent signal low status.  Associating with people of low status lowers one’s own status.  People prefer to affiliate with other people of high status, and avoiding complainers is a way to do this.

(3) Complainers may need scarce resources.  And people are selfish, so avoid complainers.

So if you want to get by with people, form productive relationships, win a desirable spouse and a good job and all that, you’d be well advised to stop complaining so much and learn to act contented, even if you’re not.

The trouble with this strategy is that most people aren’t contented.  Rather, they’re full of thwarted desires and anxiety and depression.  So if they want to project contentment to other people, they need to learn to lie about what they’re really feeling.  And as any student of lies knows, you’ll be much a much better liar if you learn to believe your own lies (self-deception is at the core of human social life).  You tell yourself that you are a happy person, a successful person, that your hard work will be rewarded (and, when the unreality of that claim becomes too much to bear that virtue is its own reward).  And so on.

But lying to yourself successfully takes a lot of time and practice:  it takes years to successfully internalize the bullshit that allows us to get along successfully in society.  Grown-ups have a lot of practice at this.  Adolescents, not so much, and so it is with the adolescent that we see the unhappiness and thwarted desire leaking out so much more readily.

And that is why we associate unhappiness with the world with being “adolescent.”

One man’s modus ponens…

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on One man’s modus ponens…
May 292011
 

Back in my graduate school days the philosophers among us circulated a maxim:

One man’s modus ponens is another man’s modus tollens.

Amidst the philosophers, I would sometimes make an argument against negative utilitarianism to the effect that if you really believed in it, it would entail that we should make the human species go extinct.  This argument was intended as a reductio ad absurdum of negative utilitarianism.

Two decades on, though, it makes me think that perhaps one man’s modus tollens can be another man’s modus ponens.

 Posted by at 01:27

Ligotti on religion

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Ligotti on religion
May 282011
 

It will take some philosophical spade-work before I think I can intelligently discuss Thomas Ligotti’s dismissal of transhumanism in The Conspiracy against the Human Race, but while I’m spading, I can at least let you all enjoy the magnificent things he has to say about the Abrahamic religions.

Many people in the world are always looking to science to save them from something.  But just as many, or more, prefer old and reputable belief systems and their sectarian offshoots for salvation.  So they trust in the deity of the Old Testament, an incontinent dotard who soiled Himself and the universe with His corruption, a low-budget divinity passing itself off as the genuine article.  (Ask the Gnostics.)  They trust in Jesus Christ, a historical cipher stitched together like Frankenstein’s monster out of the parts robbed from the graves of messiahs dead and burried — a savior on a stick.  They trust in the virgin-pimping Allah and his Drum Major Mohammed, a prophet-come-lately who pioneered a new genre of humbuggery for an emerging market of believers that was not being adequately served by existing religious products.

Jesus as Frankenstein’s monster — that’s awesome.  And more accurate than most people know

 Posted by at 13:46

Now Reading _The Conspiarcy against the Human Race_

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Now Reading _The Conspiarcy against the Human Race_
May 212011
 

I have read some of Thomas Ligotti‘s eerie fiction before and been impressed, so I’m very much looking forward to this work of philosophical pessimism. I mad an eager trip down to my mail receiver this morning just to pick it up.

It’s perverse of me to look forward with such pleasure to a work about the horrors of existence, but that’s how it is.  I hope to be able to write about it soon.

 Posted by at 16:02

I’m out of the closet

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on I’m out of the closet
May 212011
 

 Posted by at 13:51

Adding Sobel’s page

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Adding Sobel’s page
May 092010
 

This blog is embryonic, and time is scarce, but I shall add things here occasionally.

One thing I have added is a passage from Jordan Howard Sobel’s Logic and Theism that resonated with me.  I’ll comment on it in a series of posts.  The thing that struck me immediately was on reading the words:

An ‘objective humanist’ might say that there can be nothing to which it would not be beneath the proper dignity of a human being to bend and to worship. He might say that, far from ever being appropriate, worship done by a human being regardless of the object, would be disrespectful of his humanity and wrong.

And I thought back to being a teenager, growing up surrounded by a lot of eager Christians, and thinking something lie:

If accepting Jesus as my personal savior is the price of admission to heaven, then hell doesn’t look like such a bad deal.

Seriously.

 Posted by at 14:23

Test post

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Test post
Apr 042010
 

This is a test post for diabasis.com.  This site will develop later, but for the moment I’m simply planting my flag on this piece of Internet real estate.

The site takes its name from a Greek word which means “crossing over” or “passage.”

 Posted by at 20:48